skip to main |
skip to sidebar
15:22
ex blogger
An image claiming to show the new Samsung Galaxy S
IV has been leaked online, showing only minor cosmetic differences to the Galaxy
S III.
The biggest change shown on the leaked image
is the absence of physical buttons from the the front of the device and a taller
screen.
SamMobile.com, who published the image, claim it originated from
an insider at Samsung, but could not confirm the specifications of the device or
any further details.
While its validity is far from certain, the photo is
the first purported image of Samsung's next iPhone-challenger, the successor to
last year's best-selling Galaxy S III.
Samsung became the top selling
phone handset maker in the world in 2012, with sales of the Galaxy range of
smartphones leading the companies net profit up 91 per cent year-on-year at the
end of its third quarter. Over the course of the year Samsung added two new
phones to the Galaxy S line, the S III and S III mini. The Galaxy S III sold
more than 30 million handsets in just seven months.
The strength of the
Galaxy S line is expected to continue Samsung's mobile phone growth through 2013
according to analysts, with the gap between it and Apple, their nearest
competitor in the smartphone marketplace, expected to grow.
2 comments:
If Samsung Galaxy S IV is shy of the Phablet category and boasts a 4.99" screen, then what should be the screen size of Galaxy S V will be? will it be the same? or 4.999"? or will it cross 5" to be a smart phablet instead of a smartphone? The way smartphones are getting increased screen size and tablets are getting reduced screen size after 1-2 years there won't be any difference between a tablet and a smartphone.
quad core...very good.. now lets see how they optimize the software for that. As far as S3 goes, despite of advanced features the phones stills lags.. only putting in cores with biiiiiiiiig screens is not enough... by the way these features of S4 are already availbale on Xperia Z with superb performance.... samsung is good with innovations on paper rather than performance.
Post a Comment